Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3685 (JHR)

VIKASH YADAV @ VIKASH KUMAR YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./421/2026 · 2026-02-25

Sri Ananda Sen

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:5498 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 421 of 2026 ----- Vikash Yadav @ Vikash Kumar Yadav, S/o Ramdev Yadav, R/o Village Kekargarh, P.O. Dwarika, P.S. Panki, Dist Palamu, Jharkhand .... Petitioner(s). Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party(s). ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, AddI. P.P. …...... 02/ 25.02.2026: This bail application has been filed under Sections 483 & 484 of BNSS, 2023 wherein, prayer has been made for grant of bail as he is in custody for allegedly committing offence punishable under Sections 21(b), 21(c), 22(b), 22(c) and 29 of N.D.P.S. 2. Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner learned counsel for the State and have also gone through the impugned order. 3. Learned AddI. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. 4. The earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was withdrawn on 25.06.2025 in B.A. No.5043 of 2025 and rejected on 18.09.2025 in B.A. No.2986 of 2025. The trial is in progress and three witnesses have been examined in this case out of seven prosecution witnesses. 5. Considering the aforesaid fact and the fact that the trial is in progress, I am not inclined to grant privilege of bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Panki P.S. Case No.34 of 2024, corresponding to N.D.P.S. Case No.08 of 2024, pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-VI, Palamau at Daltongaj stands rejected. 6. The Trial Court requested to conclude the trial within a period of six months from the date of receipt a copy of this order. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 25th February, 2026 R.S./ Uploaded on 26/02/2026