1 CGHC010335992026 2026:CGHC:41466 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 1194 of 2026 1 - Ganpatibai Wife Of Ramkumar Aged About 37 Years Resident Of Village Nagarda, Tehsil Baradwar, District Janjgir-Champa, Present District Shakti (C.G.) 2 - Leelabai Wife Of Shivkumar Aged About 26 Years Resident Of Village Nagarda, Tehsil Baradwar, District Janjgir-Champa, Present District Shakti (C.G.) 3 - Milap Singh Son Of Late Noharsay Aged About 60 Years Resident Of Village Nagarda, Tehsil Baradwar, District Janjgir-Champa, Present District Shakti (C.G.) 4 - Ramkumar Son Of Milap Singh Aged About 45 Years Resident Of Village Nagarda, Tehsil Baradwar, District Janjgir-Champa, Present District Shakti (C.G.) 5 - Shivkumar Son Of Milap Singh Aged About 35 Years Resident Of Village Nagarda, Tehsil Baradwar, District Janjgir-Champa, Present District Shakti (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1 - Darsmati Bai Widow Of Late Noharsay Aged About 77 Years Resident Of Nagarda, Tehsil Naya Baradwar, District Janjgir-Champa Present District Shakti (C.G.) 2 - Milautinbai D/o Late Noharsay Aged About 58 Years W/o Kripalsingh, VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2026.09.23 18:48:21 +0530 2 Resident Of Nagarda, Tehsil Baradwar, District Janjgir-Champa Present District Shakti (C.G.) Presently Residing At Korba (Darri), Tehsil And District Korba (C.G.) 3 - Silobai D/o Late Noharsay Aged About 55 Years W/o Balha, Caste Kanwar, Resident Of Nagarda, Tehsil Baradwar, District Janjgir-Champa Present District Shakti (C.G.) Presently Residing At Village Bhuthia, Tehsil And District Korba (C.G.) 4 - Dilobai D/o Late Noharsay Aged About 52 Years W/o Sidar Singh, Caste Kanwar, Resident Of Nagarda, Tehsil Baradwar, District Janjgir-Champa Present District Shakti (C.G.) 5 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Sakti, District Sakti (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : None For Respondent No.5/State : Mr. Malay Jain, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 23/09/2026 1. None appears for the petitioners despite repeated calls, and no representation is made. 2. Since no one appears on behalf of the petitioners and no representation is made, the present writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved