Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36845 (PNJ)

DIYAL SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHER

CRM-M/10836/2026 · 2026-09-02

Jasjit Singh Bedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (135) CRM-M-10836-2026 (O & M) Date of decision: 02.09.2026 Diyal Singh and ors. ... Petitioners V/s State of Punjab and ors. ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) Status report dated 01.09.2026 filed on behalf of the respondent-State is taken on record. 2. On 24.02.2026, the following order was passed by this Court:- The prayer in the present petition under Section 528 BNSS is for quashing of an FIR No.0047 dated 16.09.2025 registered under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 191(3), 190 BNS at Police Station Handesra, District SAS Nagar and DDR vide General Diary No.018 dated 16.09.2025 (cross version/ consequential proceedings) at Police Station Handesra, District SAS Nagar and all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 16.02.2026 (Annexure P-3) entered into between the parties. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in order to live peacefully, parties have entered into compromise on 16.02.2026 (Annexure P-3), according to which, both the parties have agreed not to proceed further with the FIR in question. Notice of motion. SUKHPREET KAUR 2026.09.03 09:13 I agree to specified portions of this document ::2:: Mr. Harkanwar Jeet Singh, Asstt. A.G., Punjab who is present in Court accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1- State. Mr. Varinder Singh, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.3 to 6 and has filed his Vakalatnama. The same is taken on record. She does not dispute the above said compromise, which has been arrived at between the parties, according to which, complainant does not wish to press the allegations alleged in the FIR any further. Adjourned to 02.09.2026. Keeping in view the above, the parties are directed to appear before the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate for recording of their statement upto 22.05.2026 with regard to the compromise/settlement dated 16.02.2026 (P-3) by moving an appropriate application or by presenting this order. The Trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate is directed to submit the report on or before the next date of hearing containing the following information in a tabulated format:- 1. Number of persons arrayed accused in the FIR; 2. Whether any accused is a proclaimed offender; 3. Whether the compromise is genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence; 4. Whether the accused persons are involved in any other FIR or not; and 5.The statements of the complainant and all the victims/persons aggrieved shall be recorded by the Trial Court; 6. The Trial Court is also directed to record the statement of the Investigating Officer so as to know how many victims/complainants are there in the FIR and all the victim/complainant as well as accused are party to the compromise in question. The petitioners shall deposit a cost of Rs.25,000/- (collectively) with the Sadhna Society for the Mentally Handicapped, Near Housing Board Chowk, Raen Basera Building, Manimajra, Sector 13, Chandigarh on or before the date of recording of their statements and produce the receipt of the SUKHPREET KAUR 2026.09.03 09:13 I agree to specified portions of this document ::3:: same to the Trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate who shall refer to the said fact in his/ her report submitted to this Court. 3. None has appeared on behalf of the petitioners. 4. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed. 5. The pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly. September 02, 2026 ( JASJIT SINGH BEDI) sukhpreet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUKHPREET KAUR 2026.09.03 09:13 I agree to specified portions of this document