Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010458902025 NC: 2026:KHC:44544 WP NO.21197 OF 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.21197 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
1. SMT. KANTHAMMA W/O LATE MUKUND, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS. 2. SRI. NAVEEN KUMAR S/O LATE MUKUND, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS. 3. SMT. RAMYA D/O LATE MUKUND, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS. 4. SRI. ANJINAPPA S/O LATE OBALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS. 5. SRI. SHESHAPPA S/O LATE OBALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS. 6. SRI. RAMESH S/O LATE OBALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDING AT:
KURUDUSONNENAHALLI VILLAGE, VIRGONAGAR POST, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 049. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MADHUSUDAN M., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010458902025 NC: 2026:KHC:44544 WP NO.21197 OF 2025
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, BENGALURU - 560 009. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION, BENGALURU - 560 009. 4. THE TAHSILDAR K.R. PURAM, BENGALURU - 560 049. 5. SRI. P. RAVI KUMAR S/O SRI. PAPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT KURUDUSONNENAHALLI VILLAGE, VIRGONAGAR POST, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 049. 6. SRI. P. KESHAVA S/O SRI. PAPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT KURUDUSONNENAHALLI VILLAGE, VIRGONAGAR POST, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 049. 7. SRI. S. GEORGE VICTOR S/O LATE SAVARINATHAN, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/AT NO.95, 3RD BLOCK, GANDHINAGAR,
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010458902025 NC: 2026:KHC:44544 WP NO.21197 OF 2025
ROBERTSONPET, K.G.F, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 122. 8. SRI. A. SAMUEL JOHSON S/O A. ABRAHAM, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT NO.1220, 5TH CROSS, GOWTHAM NAGAR, ROBERTSON PET, K.G.F., KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 122. REP. BY HIS G.P.A. HOLDER SRI. SAMUEL PAUL J.
S/O SRI. JAYASEELAN, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS. 9. SRI. S. RUBAN KUMAR, S/O LATE A. SOWRIDAS, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT NO.1220, MAADHA COTTAGE, 5TH CROSS, GOWTHAM NAGAR, ROBERTSON PET, K.G.F., KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 122. 10. SRI. I. THERES RAJ S/O LATE IRUDAYAM, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.64, BACHLOR'S QUARTERS, MARIKUPAM POST, K.G.F, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 122. 11. KUMARI PRIYA DARSHINI J.
D/O SRI.
JAYARAM M., AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT NO.14, SOUTH GILLBERTS BLOCK, MARIKUPAM, K.G.F., KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 119. 12. KUMARI SARANYA ILLAYADARSHINI J.
D/O SRI. JAYARAM.M., AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT NO.14, SOUTH GILLBERTS BLOCK,
- 4 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010458902025 NC: 2026:KHC:44544 WP NO.21197 OF 2025
MARIKUPAM, K.G.F., KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 119. 13. SRI. UDAYA KUMAR S/O SATHIA NATHAN, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/AT NO.B-46, GOSPEL COTTAGE, BHARATH NAGAR, BEML NAGAR POST, BEML, K.G.F., KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 115. 14. SRI. A. PRANCIS, S/O A. ARUMAINATHAN, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/AT NO.807, 1ST CROSS, SWARNA NAGAR, ROBERTSON PET, K.G.F., KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 122. 15. SRI. A. PERIA NAYAGAM S/O ANTHONY CRUZE, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT NO.B-152, BHARATH NAGAR, K.D. PLANTATION, BEML NAGAR POST, K.G.F., KOLAR DISTRICT - 561 115. 16. SMT. PRABHVATHI SHANKAR NAYAK W/O SHANKAR NAYAK, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT NO.A-64, MATHRU CHAYA, BHARATH NAGAR, BEML NAGAR POST, K.G.F., KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 115. 17. SMT. PAPAMMA @ PRABHAVATHI D/O LATE OBLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT KURUDUSONNENAHALLI VILLAGE, VIRGONAGAR POST,
- 5 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010458902025 NC: 2026:KHC:44544 WP NO.21197 OF 2025
BIDRAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU - 560 049. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R4;
SRI. NITHIN RAMESH, ADVOCATE FOR R7, R12 AND R13;
SRI. A. RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. V.N. SHANKARE GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R5, R6, R8 TO R11 AND R14 TO R17)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE
ORDER DATED 08TH APRIL, 2025 AND CORRIGENDUM DATED 28TH APRIL, 2025 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 IN CASE NO.RP/11/2022 VIDE ANNEXURES 'N' AND 'P' RESPECTIVELY AS THE SAME ARE ILLEGAL, UNJUST, ARBITRARY, MALAFIDE, UNREASONABLE AND GROSSLY VIOLATIVE OF PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE; DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS 1 TO 4 TO CONTINUE THE NAME OF THE PETITIONERS IN THE REVENUE RECORDS; AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
In this petition, petitioners are challenging the order dated 08th April, 2025 (Annexure-N) and corrigendum dated 28th April, 2025 (Annexure-P) passed by the respondent No.2 in Case No.RP/11/2022; inter alia sought for a direction to the
- 6 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010458902025 NC: 2026:KHC:44544 WP NO.21197 OF 2025
respondents 1 to 4 to continue the name of petitioners in the revenue records in respect of the subject land.
2. Heard Sri. Madhusudan M.,
learned counsel appearing for petitioners; Smt. B.P. Radha, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents 1 to 4; Sri. Nithin Ramesh, learned counsel appearing for respondents 7, 12 and 13; and Sri. A. Ravishankar, learned counsel on behalf of Sri. V.N. Shankare Gowda, appearing for respondents 5, 6, 8 to 11; and 14 to 17.
3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, on careful perusal of the finding record by the respondent No.2 in the impugned order dated 08th April, 2025 (Annexure-N), the same would indicate that the respondents 5 to 17 are claiming right over the property in question based on the registered Sale Deed dated 15th May, 2004. It is also forthcoming that the petitioners have filed Original Suit No.287/2012 before the competent Civil Court. In this connection, it is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the respondents that the said suit was dismissed. In that view of the matter, I am of the view that the finding recorded by
- 7 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010458902025 NC: 2026:KHC:44544 WP NO.21197 OF 2025
respondent-Authorities is just and proper as the mutation has been made based on the registered instrument. Therefore, no interference be called for in this petition. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed.
SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE
ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9