[2026:RJ-JP:10829] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4806/2026 Smt. Jasoda Rani W/o Shri Ramjilal, Aged About 72 Years, R/o Rupla Paysa, Atalbandh, Tehsil And District Bharatpur, Raj. ----Petitioner/defendant Versus 1. Radhakishan S/o Late Shri Ram Singh, (Deceased) 1/1. 1/1/1. 1/1/2. 1/1/3. 1/1/4. Sushil Kumar Soni S/o Late Shri Radhakishan, (Deceased) Smt. Beena, Aged About 57 Years, W/o Late Shri Sushil Kumar Soni Neelam D/o Late Shri Sushil Kumar Soni, W/o Lokesh Soni, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Near Manipal Hospital, New Delhi Maghvendra, Aged About 31 Years, S/o Late Shri Sushil Kumar Soni. Bodhini D/o Late Shri Sushil Kumar Soni, Aged About 29 Years, Respondent No. 1/1/3 And 1/1/4 Both Are R/o Atalbandh Mandi, Rambabu Pehlwan Ki Gali, Bharatpur. 1/2. Amit Kumar Soni S/o Late Shri Radhakishan, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Rupla Paysa, Atalbandh Mandi, Bharatpur. 1/3. Pushplata Swarnkar D/o Late Shri Radhakishan, W/o Shri Rambharosi Swarnkar, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Near Nagar Parishad, Tehsil And District Karauli. 1/4. Bulbul D/o Late Shri Radhakishan, W/o Shri Bangali Soni, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Near Nagar Parishad, Tehsil And District Karauli. 1/5. Kalpana D/o Late Shri Radhakishan, W/o Shri Dharmendra Soni, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Radhamadhav Nagar, Near Alfa School, Mathura. 2. 3. 4. Vishan Singh, Aged About 72 Years, S/o Late Shri Ram Singh Shri Bhagwan, Aged About 65 Years, S/o Late Shri Ram Singh Smt. Usha Devi W/o Late Shri Yogendra Singh, Aged About 69 Years, Respondent No. 2, 3 And 4 Are R/o [2026:RJ-JP:10829] (2 of 3) [CW-4806/2026] Rupla Paysa, Atalbandh, Tehsil And District Bharatpur, Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. JK Moolchandani For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 16/03/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed assailing the order dated 09.02.2026, passed by learned Civil Judge, Bharatput, in Misc. Case No. 38/2019, whereby the application filed by the defendant-petitioner under Section 60 Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act of 2023'), has been rejected. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the documents are registered documents, of which the certified copy were obtained by the petitioner from another suit and were placed on record in the present suit along with the application filed under Section 60 of the Act of 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be granted liberty to obtain the certified copy of the public document from the public office and thereafter, be permitted to place them on record. 3. Heard and perused the material available on record. 4. Considering the same, the present writ petition is disposed of. This Court does not deem it appropriate to interfere with the impugned order dated 09.02.2026. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to obtain the certified copy of the public document [2026:RJ-JP:10829] (3 of 3) [CW-4806/2026] from the public office and if any such documents are filed the learned Trial Court is expected to decide the matter in accordance with law. 5. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (BIPIN GUPTA),J JUBIN /5