Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36827 (CHH)

VISHNU PRASAD DWIVEDI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2135/2021 · 2026-09-23

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010111462021 2026:CGHC:41523 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2135 of 2021 Vishnu Prasad Dwivedi S/o Late Nakul Prasad Dwivedi Aged About 85 Years R/o Village Podi, Block Bodla, Tahsil Bodla, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Collector Kabirdham, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. 3 - Executive Engineer Public Works Department, Kabirdham District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. 4 - Sub Divisional Officer Public Works Department Sub Division Bodla, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. 5 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Kawardha, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Kaushal Yadav , Advocate For State/Respondents : Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Dy. G.A. Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 24.09.2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, despite his efforts, he has not received any instructions from his client to argue the matter further. YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2026.09.24 17:10:46 +0530 2 2. In view of the aforesaid position and in the absence of necessary instructions from his client, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that he does not wish to press the present writ petition. 3. Learned State counsel does not oppose the aforesaid submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed for want of instructions. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh