-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 113 Date of Decision:- 24.08.2026 ANIL KUMAR GOYAL (MODI) ....Petitioner(s) Versus MOHD. ISMAIL @ ISMAILA (DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LEGAL HEIRS ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present : None. ***** SANJIV BERRY, J. (ORAL) 1. Despite the matter having been passed over earlier and the case having been called twice, none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner . 2. Even as per the office report, the petitioner has not filed the process fee for summoning the respondents. 3. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present petition 4. Accordingly, petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. (SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 24.08.2026 S.Sharma i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No SANDAL SHARMA 2026.08.24 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment