CRM-M-36023 IN THE H (213) RINKU AND O STATE OF PUN CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Mr. MANISHA BAT 1. Thro Bharatiya Naga petitioners seeks registered under 04.06.2026 regis of Bharatiya Nya added later on) at 2. Vide petitioners were investigation. 6023-2026 (O&M) (1) HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AN CHANDIGARH CRM Dat ND ORS Versus F PUNJAB HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANI Mr. J.K. Singla, Advocate for the pe Mr. Roshandeep Singh, AAG, Punja **** BATRA, J. (ORAL) Through the instant petition und Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeks anticipatory bail in case DDR under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 190, 1 istered under Sections 110, 115( ya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BN on) at Police Station City Budhlada, D Vide order dated 07.07.2026 pa ere released on interim bail an AB AND HARYANA AT CRM-M-36023-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 07.08.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondent MANISHA BATRA r the petitioners , Punjab n under Section 482 of the 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’), the DDR No.39 dated 13.06.2026 190, 191(3) in FIR No.99 dated , 115(2), 351(2), 190, 191(3), 49 rt “BNS”) (Section 109 of BNS lada, District Mansa. 26 passed by this Court, the ail and was directed to join AMIT SHARMA 2026.08.07 16:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-36023 3. Lear have joined the i of the petitioner arrested in the ca 4. This counsel for the pa 5. In investigation and be a reason for especially when nature of allegati without commen of anticipatory b the petition is all petitioners is mad in Section 482(2) 6. Sinc application, if an 07.08.2026 Amit Sharma 6023-2026 (O&M) (2) Learned State counsel on instruction d the investigation on 10.07.2026 and itioners is required as the remaining the case and the case is still under inve This Court has heard the rival sub r the parties at considerable length. view of the fact that the petitione and the non-arrest of the co-accuse on for denying benefit of pre-arres when their custodial interrogation is llegations, their pre-trial incarceration mmenting on merits of case, it is obs tory bail is made out in favour of the is allowed and the order 07.07.2026 is made absolute, subject to complian 482(2) of BNSS. Since the main petition has bee , if any, is rendered infructuous. (MA Whether speaking/reasoned:- Ye ructions states that the petitioners 6 and the custodial interrogation aining co-accused has not been er investigation. al submissions made by learned titioners have already joined the accused cannot be considered to arrest bail to the petitioners tion is not required. Given the eration is not required. As such, is observed that a case for grant of the petitioners. Accordingly, .2026 granting interim bail to the pliance of conditions laid down as been disposed of, pending (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.08.07 16:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.