Dilip Kumar Bhagat and Anr v. The State Of Bihar and Ors
CWJC/4513/2015 · 2026-01-12
Rajiv Roy
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 36783 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 36783 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4513 of 2015 ======================================================
1. Dilip Kumar Bhagat and Anr Son of Mangal Prasad Bhagat, Resident of Village - Barsoi Bazar Mechhli-Hat, Police Station - Barsoi, District - Katihar.
2. Juhi Lal @ Johilal Roy, Son of Ram Lal @ Ram Lal Roy Resident of Village Bhag Barsoi, Police Station - Barsoi, District - Katihar. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State Of Bihar and Ors
2. The Deputy Collector of Land Reforms at Barsoi, District Katihar.
3. The Circle Officer, Barsoi, Block District Katihar.
4. The Circle Inspector, Barsoi Block, District Katihar.
5. Badri Prasad Sah, Son of Late Bodhu Sah, Resident of Village- Barsoi Bazar, Police Station - Barsoi, District - Katihar.
6. Chhatu Prasad Sah, Son of Late Ram Bilash Sah,
7. Mithoo Prasad Sah, Son of Late Ram Bilash Sah, null
8. Bharat Prasad Sah, Son of Late Ram Bilash Sah,
9. Bihari Prasad Sah, Son of Late Ram Bilash Sah,
10. Shambhu Prasad Sah, Son of Late Thakur Prasad Sah,
11. Ram Prabesh Sah, Son of Late Thakur Prasad Sah,
12. Priya Nath Sah, Son of Late Rinkoo Prasad Sah,
13. Jai Narayan Prasad Sah Son of Late Rinkoo Pd. Sah,
14. Manoj Sah, Son of Late Mathura Prasad Sah, All are resident of village Barsoi Bazar, Police Station - Barsoi, District -Katihar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. G.P. Bimal, Adv. For the State : Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha, AC to EX-G.A.9 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 4 12-01-2026 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner though Mr. G.P. Bimal representing the respondents 5 to 14 is present beside the learned State Counsel.
2. The present application has been preferred:
Patna High Court CWJC No.4513 of 2015(4) dt.12-01-2026 2/2 against the order dated 26.12.2013 passed by the learned Divisional Commissioner, purnea in Land Dispute Appeal No. 116 of 2013 and the consequential order dated 30.9.2014 passed by the Deputy Collector, of Land Reforms, Barsoi District Katihar in Case No. 159 of 2012-13 whereby and whereunder the said authorities have allowed the claim of Private Respondent no. 5 to 14 over the disputed lands in the Circumstances set forth below.
3. Learned counsel, Mr. Bimal has pointed out that the
order dated 19.05.2017 of the Co-ordinate Bench for filing substitution petition has not been complied by the petitioner.
4. Be that as it may, since there is no appearance, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
niku/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U