TEJINDER SINGH @ TEJINDERPAL SINGH @ GAGGU v. STATE OF PUNJAB
CRM-M/34320/2026 · 2026-08-07
Manisha Batra
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 36778 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 36778 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-34320 IN THE H (212)
TEJINDER SIN STATE OF PUN CORAM: HON
Present:
Ms. Mr. Mr. MANISHA BAT
1. Thro Bharatiya Naga petitioner seeks registered under Nyaya Sanhita, 2 on) at Police Stat
2. Vide petitioner was investigation. 4320-2026 (O&M) (1) HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AN CHANDIGARH
CRM
Dat R SINGH @ TEJINDERPAL SING
Versus F PUNJAB
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANI Ms. Sukhmanjot Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Amit Arora, Advocate for the pe Mr. Roshandeep Singh, AAG, Punja **** BATRA, J. (ORAL) Through the instant petition und Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR under Sections 126(2), 351(2), 115(2) hita, 2023 (for short “BNS”) (Section ce Station Sadar Tarn Taran, District T Vide order dated 22.06.2026 pa was released on interim bail an
AB AND HARYANA AT
CRM-M-34320-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 07.08.2026 SINGH @ GAGGU
... Petitioner
...Respondent MANISHA BATRA ate for r the petitioner , Punjab n under Section 482 of the 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’), the FIR No.273 dated 20.11.2025 115(2), 304(2), 3(5) of Bharatiya ion 117(2) of BNS added later trict Tarn Taran. passed by this Court, the ail and was directed to join AMIT SHARMA 2026.08.07 16:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-34320
3. Lear has joined the in of the petitioner i
4. This for the parties. 5. In investigation and is not required. observed that a c the petitioner. 22.06.2026 grant to compliance of
6. Sinc application, if an
07.08.2026 Amit Sharma
4320-2026 (O&M) (2) Learned State counsel on instruction the investigation on 11.07.2026 and ioner is not required. This Court has heard the submission
view of the fact that the petition on and given the nature of allegations uired. As such, without commenting hat a case for grant of anticipatory ba . Accordingly, the petition is granting interim bail to the petitione nce of conditions laid down in Section Since the main petition has bee , if any, is rendered infructuous. (MA
Whether speaking/reasoned:- Ye
ructions states that the petitioner and the custodial interrogation issions made by learned counsel petitioner has already joined the ations, his pre-trial incarceration enting on merits of case, it is ory bail is made out in favour of n is allowed and the order titioner is made absolute, subject ection 482(2) of BNSS.
as been disposed of, pending (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.08.07 16:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.