Omprakash Dani and Anr. v. Arya Pratinidhi Sabha and Ors.
FA/198/2014 · 2026-09-21
Smt Sushma Sawant
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 36772 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 36772 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
CGHC010007022014
2026:CGHC:41273
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA No. 170 of 2014 1 - Ramnarayan Nishad, S/o. Bhurwa Ram Nishad, Aged About 51 Years, R/o. Village- Kutelabhatha, Jewra Sirsa, Tahsil & District Durg, Chhattisgarh 2 - Than Singh Nishad, S/o. Bhurwa Ram Nishad, Aged About 37 Years, R/o. Village- Kutelabhatha, Jewra Sirsa, Tahsil & District Durg, Chhattisgarh
--- Appellants versus 1 - Omprakash Dani, S/o. Late Premlal Dani, Aged About 55 Years, R/o. Banbarad, Tahsil Dhamdha, District Durg, Chhattisgarh 2 - Sunil Dani, S/o. Late Premlal Dani, Aged About 43 Years, R/o. Banbarad, Tahsil Dhamdha, District Durg, Chhattisgarh 3 - Arya Pratinidhi Sabha, M.P. & Vidarbha, Head Office- Maharishi Dayanand Bhavan, Mangalwari, Sadar Nagpur, Maharashtra 4 - Chhattisgarh Prantiya Arya Pratinidhi Sabha, Dayanand Parisar, Arya Nagar, Durg, Tahsil & District Durg, Chhattisgarh. Through Pradhan Acharya Daya Sagar, S/o. Dasrath Bisi, Aged about 40 years, Dayanand Parisar, Arya Nagar, Durg, Chhattisgarh ASHOK SAHU Digitally signed by ASHOK SAHU Date: 2026.09.23 10:48:00 +0530
2 5 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through- Collector, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh
--- Respondents For Appellants : Mr. H.B.Agrawal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Preeti Yadav, Advocate For Respondents No.1 & 2 : Mr. Praveen K. Dhurandhar, Advocate For Respondent No. 3 & 4 : None appeared For Respondent No.5 : Ms. Binu Sharma, Panel Lawyer & FA No. 198 of 2014 1 - Omprakash Dani, S/o. Late Prem Lal Dani, Aged About 55 Years, R/o. Village- Banbarad, Tahsil Dhamdha, District Durg, Chhattisgarh 2 - Sunil Dani, S/o. Late Premlal Dani, Aged About 43 Years, R/o. Village- Banbarad, Tahsil Dhamdha, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh
---Appellants Versus 1 - Arya Pratinidhi Sabha, M.P. & Vidarbha, Mukhyalaya Maharishi Dayanand Bhawan, Mangalwari, Sadar, Nagpur, Maharashtra. 2 - Chhattisgarh Prantiya Arya Pratinidhi Sabha, Dayanand Parisar, Arya Nagar, Durg, Tahsil & District Durg, Chhattisgarh, Through- Pradhan Acharya Daya Sagar, S/o. Dashrath Bisi, Aged About 40 Years, Dayanand Parisar, Arya Nagar, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Ram Narayan Nishad, S/o. Bhurwa Ram Nishad, Aged About 51 Years, R/o. Village- Kutelabhatha, Jewra Sirsa, Tahsil & District : Durg, Chhattisgarh
3 4 - Than Singh Nishad, S/o. Bhurwa Ram Nishad, Aged About 37 Years, R/o. Village- Kutelabhatha, Jewra Sirsa, Tahsil & District : Durg, Chhattisgarh. 5 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through- Collector, Durg, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondents
For Appellants : Mr.
Praveen K. Dhurandhar, Advocate For Respondents No.1 & 2 : None appeared For Respondent No. 3 & 4 : Mr. H.B.Agrawal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Preeti Yadav, Advocate For Respondent No.5 : Ms. Binu Sharma, Panel Lawyer (Single Bench)
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Sushma Sawant
Order on Board 22.09.2026 Both the appeals have been preferred against the impugned
judgment and decree dated 29.10.2014 passed by the learned Sixth Additional District Judge, Durg in Civil Suit No.18-A/2013. F.A. No. 198 of 2014 Heard on I.A.No.1/2026 i.e. Application for withdrawal of the first appeal filed by the appellants. On due consideration and for the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed.
4 Accordingly, the First Appeal No.198 of 2014 is dismissed as withdrawn. F.A. No. 170 of 2014 Learned senior counsel appearing for the appellants wants to withdraw this appeal in view of the withdrawal of F.A. No.198 of 2014. Accordingly, the First Appeal No.170 of 2014 is also dismissed as withdrawn. In view of the above, both the first appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Sushma Sawant)
Judge Ashok