Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36760 (MAD)

Tvl. Selvaa Timbers and Saw Mill, v. The State Tax officer/Commercial Tax Officer

WP(MD)/16036/2026 · 2026-06-15

D Bharatha Chakravarthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P(MD)No.16036 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 15.06.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P(MD)No.16036 of 2026 and W.M.P(MD)No.12007 of 2026 Tvl. Selvaa Timbers and Saw Mill, Represented by its Proprietor, M. Arockiadoss, 63/1,Vagai Dam Road, Thenkarai, Periyakulam, Theni – 625603. ... Petitioner(s) – Vs. - 1.The State Tax Officer/commercial Tax Officer, Theni -I Assessment Circle, Commercial Tax Department, Madurai Road, Theni – 625603. ... Respondent(s) Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of CERTIORARI, calling for the records of the impugned Order passed by the Respondent in GSTIN. 33BFZPA8714A1ZL/2021-2022 Dated 19.12.2025 along with Form GST DRC-07 in Reference No. 1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.16036 of 2026 ZD331225319650Q Dated 20.12.2025 and quash the same as it is in gross violation of principles of natural justice, judicial discipline, is arbitrary, perverse and violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution and to pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and thus render justice. For Petitioner :Mr.M.N.Bharathi For Respondents :Mr.R.Parthiban Government Standing Counsel ORDER This writ petition challenges the impugned order dated 19.12.2025 which is an assessment order passed under Section 73 of the GST Act 2017. 2.I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Upon perusal of the impugned orders, it can be seen that the 2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.16036 of 2026 petitioner did not avail the opportunity, when the show cause notice is uploaded and the final order was passed. Accordingly, the impugned ex- parte orders came to be passed. 4.Even though this Court imposes 25% of the disputed tax amount as a condition to grant an opportunity, since in this case, the petitioner is said to have dealing with the exempted goods, no additional condition is imposed. 5.In view thereof, the Writ Petition is allowed on the following terms: (i)Since the petitioner is dealing with the exempted goods, the impugned order dated 19.12.2025 is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the file of the respondent for reconsideration. (ii)The assessee shall appear before the respondent without fail and submit their reply and documents in support of their claim, and it is for the respondent to consider the 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.16036 of 2026 matter afresh and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii)Since the impugned order of assessment is set aside, any attachment of the bank account made pursuant to the impugned order shall raised. (iv)No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 15.06.2026 NCC:Yes/No To The State Tax Officer/commercial Tax Officer, Theni -I Assessment Circle, Commercial Tax Department, Madurai Road, Theni 625 603 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.16036 of 2026 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. Ns W.P(MD)No.16036 of 2026 and W.M.P(MD)No.12007 of 2026 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.16036 of 2026 15.06.2026 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis