Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10453 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 18.06.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL CRL OP(MD). No. 10453 of 2026 Rajasekar ...Petitioner Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Pattuveeranpatti Police Station, Dindigul District. (Crime No.245 of 2024) ...Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Ms.M.Nithya Sowmya Advocate For Respondent : Mr.G.Ganesh Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Cr.No. 245 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner / Accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 28.06.2024, for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c) r/w. 20(b)(ii)(C), 25 and 29(i) of NDPS Act, in Crime No.245 of 2024 on the file of 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10453 of 2026 the respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that on secret information on 28.06.2024 the respondent police went to the scene of occurrence and found that the accused persons are in possession of 20.700 kilo grams of ganja. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he was falsely implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Though the quantity involved is commercial quantity, no contraband was recovered from this petitioner and the entire contraband have been recovered from Co-accused. This petitioner has been implicated on the basis of the confession statement of the co-accused. Co-accused in this case have also been released on bail. The petitioner was not arrested in the scene of occurrence. The petitioner is not the named accused in the FIR. Hence, he prayed bail for the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (crl. Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the offence are grave in nature. The entire contraband has been recovered from co-accused namely A1. On their 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10453 of 2026 confession statement the other accused persons have been implicated in this case. The petitioner has three previous cases. Investigation has been completed and charge sheet has also been filed. Hence, he opposed the grant of bail to the petitioner. 5. This Court heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the rival submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, considering the nature of charges levelled against the petitioner, the quantity involved in this case is commercial quantity, the contraband was recovered from A1 and no contraband has been recovered from this petitioner, on the basis of the confession statement of the co-accused this petitioner has been implicated in this case, co-accused, from whom the contraband was recovered, has also been released on bail, though the petitioner has three previous case, in that cases also already he was granted bail, and considering the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions: [a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10453 of 2026 Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned II Additional District Judge, Special Court for Narcotic Drugs adn Psychotropic Substances Act Cases, Madurai, and on further conditions that: [b] the petitioner shall report before the learned II Additional District Judge, Special Court for Narcotic Drugs adn Psychotropic Substances Act Cases, Madurai, at 10.30 a.m., and 05.00 p.m., on all working days, until further orders: [c] the petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he/she is accused, or suspected, or of the commission of which he/she is suspected; [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [e] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10453 of 2026 have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 51730]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS. (P D B J) 18.06.2026 TM To 1.The II Additional District Judge, Special Court for Narcotic Drugs adn Psychotropic Substances Act Cases, Madurai. 2.The Inspector of Police, Pattuveeranpatti Police Station, Dindigul District. (Crime No.245 of 2024) 3.The Superintendent, Central Jail, Madurai. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10453 of 2026 P. DHANABAL, J. TM ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No. 10453 of 2026 Date : 18.06.2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis