Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3674 (GAU)

EDUL ISLAM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

AB/293/2026 · 2026-03-30

Pranjal Das

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010026732026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/293/2026 EDUL ISLAM S/O KAMRUL ISLAM, R/O RANGIA, SABAN, P.O. RANGIA, P.S. RANGIA, DIST. KAMRUP, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM. 2:THE OFFICER IN-CHARGE RANGIA POLICE STATION DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM PIN-78135 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S H SIKDAR, MR. A DEKA,MS N J BEGUM Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER 31.03.2026 Heard Mr. S.H. Sikdar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Sarma, learned APP for the State. Page No.# 2/2 The instant petition has been filed seeking protection by way of anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS. However, the petitioner did not have any details regarding any case registered against him at Rangia Police Station. Accordingly, a report was called for. Pursuant thereto, a report dated 31.03.2026 has been received, wherein the Officer-in-Charge of Rangia Police Station has stated that, as per available records, no criminal case has been registered or is pending against the petitioner. In view of the above, at this stage, the bail application is not maintainable and is accordingly disposed of. Needless to say, if in future the petitioner has any bona fide apprehension of arrest in connection with any police case, he shall be at liberty to avail remedies in accordance with law. The report be kept on record and marked as ‘X’. Accordingly, the bail petition stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant