Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010540942026 NC: 2026:KHC:44537 WP NO.24684 OF 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.24684 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
SRI. ASHWATHAIAH S/O LATE GANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/A MINNAPURA VILLAGE, THYAMAGONDLU HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 123. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SRIKANTH N.V., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE TAHASILDAR NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 123.
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 561 203. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 20TH JULY, 2026 VIDE ANNEXURE-A; AND ETC.
Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010540942026 NC: 2026:KHC:44537 WP NO.24684 OF 2026
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
Sri. Spoorthy Hegde N., learned High Court Government Pleader accepts notice for respondents.
2. In this petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondent No.1 to consider the representation dated 20th July, 2026 (Annexure-A),
3. Heard Sri. Srikanth N.V., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Spoorthy Hegde N., learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for respondents.
4. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, on perusal of the averments made in the representation dated 20th July, 2026 (Annexure-A), it is forthcoming that the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondent No.1 for not to grant the subject land to any
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010540942026 NC: 2026:KHC:44537 WP NO.24684 OF 2026
other authority. I view of the fact that the petitioner is not a owner of the subject land and he do not have any legal right over the same as on today, I am of the view that no interference be called for in this petition. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29