BALESHWAR KUMAR @ BALESHWR @ SATYA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./509/2026 · 2026-02-25
Deepak Roshan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3672 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3672 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:5643 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 509 of 2026 Baleshwar Kumar @ Baleshwar @ Satya, aged about 24 years, son of Ram Kumar Saw, resident of Village-Kandabar, P.O. & P.S.-Keredari, District-Hazaribagh ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand
....Opposite party
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--- For the Petitioner(s) : M/s. Anshu Kumar, Shashikant Jaiswal,
Advocates For the State : Mr. Satish Prasad, A.P.P
--- 02/25.02.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2.
The Petitioner has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Bariyatu P.S. Case No. 33 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 324(5), 324(6), 326(f), 308(5), 111(4), 109(1) of B.N.S. and under Section 27 of Arms Act, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Latehar.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is no direct and specific allegation against him and the petitioner’s name has transpired in the case diary only on the basis of suspicion and charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. He further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 17.09.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.
4.
Learned A.P.P opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that there are specific allegations against the petitioner.
5. Having regard to the allegations made against this petitioner as well as gravity of the offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail, at this stage. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected.
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
25th February, 2026
jk
Uploaded on
26/02/2026