HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 14289 of 2026 Court No. - 65 (Sl. No.39 out of 265) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Mohd. Akbar Shah Alam Khan, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Anubhav Mishra, learned Advocate holding brief for Sri Dhiraj Singh, learned counsel for the informant, Sri D.K. Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 0053 of 2026, under Sections 69, 115(2), 131, 351(2), 352, 304(2) BNS, Police Station Koraon, Yamuna Nagar, Commissionerate Prayagraj, District Prayagraj, during the pendency of trial. 4. As per prosecution story, the applicant is stated to have established corporeal relationship with the victim on the false promise of marriage and had later on refused to comply with the said promise. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has nothing to do with the said offence. As per ossification test report, the age of the victim has come out to be 25 years. There is no clinching evidence to suggest that the applicant misled the victim from the beginning. The informant has converted a failed consensual physical relationship into a Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anand Kumar Upadhyay, Anil Kumar Tripathi, Mohd. Akbar Shah Alam Khan, Nazia Begum Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Dhiraj Singh, G.A., Kitab Ali Dileep Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) criminal case. 6. Learned counsel has further stated that there is no criminal history of the applicant. The applicant is languishing in jail since 23.2.2026 and he is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 7. Learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the bail application. 8. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, there being no clinching evidence to suggest that the applicant misled the victim from the beginning and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 9. Let the applicant- Dileep Singh, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. (i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence during trial. (ii) The applicant shall not pressurise/intimidate with the prosecution witnesses. (iii) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed. 10. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 11. It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses. May 7, 2026 Shalini BAIL No. 14289 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHALINI JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad