MD GOLAP NABI AZAD @ SAHEB SK AND ANR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
CRM (A)/2543/2026 · 2026-08-28
Md Shabbar Rashidi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 36686 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 36686 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
28.08.2026 Serial no.12 Anticipatory bail [Rejected] suman In the High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdictional Appellate Side
CRM(A) 2543 of 2026 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure corresponding to Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Samsherganj Police Station Case No.1142 of 2025 dated 03.12.2025 under Sections 329(4)/117(2)/118(2)/ 109(1)/ 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 corresponding to G.R. Case No.5319 of 2025 pending before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jangipur, Murshidabad.
-And- In the matter of : Md. Golap Nabi Azad @ Saheb Sk & Anr. … …Petitioners Mr. Arghya Chakrabarti, Advocate … … For the Petitioners Mr. Kaustav Shome Mr. Deepak Khetawak, Advocate … …For the State
1. Leave is granted to the learned advocate for the petitioners to correct the cause title of the application.
2. Upon hearing the submission made on behalf of the parties and on perusal of the materials in the case diary, it appears that the petitioners are alleged to have assaulted the victim with a sharp cutting weapon. There are statements in the case diary that implicates the present petitioners in the said assault. The injury report collected in course of investigation also suggests that the injury was caused by a sharp cutting weapon and the said injury has been classified as grievous.
3. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
4. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected.
5. CRM(A) 2543 of 2026 is dismissed. (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.) 2