Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36685 (PAT)

Bigan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CWJC/14484/2025 · 2026-02-09

Rajiv Roy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14484 of 2025 ====================================================== Bigan Kumar Son of Late Gulabi Devi, and Ram Lakhan Choudhry, Residing at Village- Badopur P.O.- Gordiha P.S. and Anchal- Rafiganj Dist- Aurangabad (Bihar) Pin Code- 824125. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Land Reforms, Government of Bihar Patna. 3. The Commissioner, Gaya (Bihar). 4. The District Magistrate, Aurangabad, Bihar. 5. The A.D.M., Land Reforms, Aurangabad, Bihar. 6. The S.D.O., Subdivision, Aurangabad, District Aurangabad, Bihar. 7. The Circle Officer, Anchal Rafiganj, District Aurangabad, Bihar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surendra Pd. Singh, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Standing Counsel (9) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 09-02-2026 Heard Mr. Surendra Pd. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. The present application has been preferred for the following relief(s): For a direction to the respondent number 4 to 7 to settle the land for home according to the circular of Bihar Government. The petitioner is belong to SC/ST and landless. He is residing on government land having made a home from 50 year bearing khata number 110 plot number 1053 area .4 dismal Thana number Patna High Court CWJC No.14484 of 2025(3) dt.09-02-2026 2/2 707 Anchal Rafiganj district Aurangabad Bihar and after then he has taken a electric line from electric department government of Bihar in his mother and he deposite the electric bill to the government. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the petition. 4. Accordingly, the same is dismissed as withdrawn. Vijay Singh/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U