BHUPENDRASINGH S/O RAMPRAKASH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/5359/2026 · 2026-04-17
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3668 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3668 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:16140] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5359/2026 Bhupendrasingh S/o Ramprakash, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Balakheda, Police Station Nadoti, District Karauli. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Karauli) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jiya UR Rahman For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 17/04/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.64/2026 registered at Police Station Nadoti, District Karauli for offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2), 125 and 329(3) of BNS, 2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that though there is an allegation against the present petitioner that he was involved in the offence but no arm or weapon has been recovered from his conscious possession. Furthermore, none of the injuries were attributed to the petitioner. There is also no medical opinion on record to substantiate that any injury was caused by the petitioner to any of the injured persons. The
[2026:RJ-JP:16140] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5359/2026] petitioner is behind the bars since 20.03.2026. Though four criminal antecedents have been reported against the present petitioner but he has already been granted bail in all those cases. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Bhupendrasingh S/o Ramprakash, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/34