NANJUNDESHWARA EDUCATIONAL TRUST (REGED) v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/18045/2026 · 2026-08-25
Ashok S Kinagi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 36678 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 36678 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010399702026 NC: 2026:KHC:46132 WP No. 18045 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 18045 OF 2026 (EDN-EX)
BETWEEN:
1.
NANJUNDESHWARA EDUCATIONAL TRUST (REGED) NO.670, KUMBARPET MAIN ROAD, KOLAR-563 101 REP. BY SECRETARY SMT. MANJULA.
2.
THE PRINCIPAL, SMART DEGREE COLLEGE, BENGALURU NORTH UNIVERSITY, TAMAKA, KOLAR-563 101, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SRI. NATESHA.C AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAILESH S KATAREY, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by SHILPABAI S Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010399702026 NC: 2026:KHC:46132 WP No. 18045 of 2026
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, (UNIVERSITY), MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001.
REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
2.
THE BENGALURU NORTH UNIVERSITY, TAMAKA, KOLAR-563 101 BY ITS REGISTRAR, EVALUATION.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. RASHMI RAO, HCGP FOR R1;
SRI.N.KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTION OR
ORDER QUASHINNG THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DATED 27.09.2024 ANNEXURE-C, ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT WHERBY THE STATUS OF THE 2 PEITIONER AS AN EXAMINATION CENTRE WAS CANCELLED AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010399702026 NC: 2026:KHC:46132 WP No. 18045 of 2026
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that due to passage of time, the writ petition has rendered infructuous and the liberty is reserved to the petitioners to make a fresh representation to the respondents.
2. The submission is placed on record.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous with the aforesaid liberty.
Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE
SSB