Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36675 (MAD)

Bhuvaneshwaran v. State rep.by

CRL OP/14686/2026 · 2026-06-11

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 14686 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP No. 14686 of 2026 Bhuvaneshwaran ..Petitioner(s) Vs State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Sathyamangalam Police Station, Erode District. Cr.No.112 of 2026. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of BNSS to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest pending investigation in cr.No.112 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s): M/S. THOMASSARANSINGH J For Respondent(s): MS.R.S.INDIRA, GOVT.ADVOCATE (CRL.SIDE) ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 296(b), 126(2), 118(1), 118(2), 351(3) of BNS (294(b), 341, 324, 326 & 506 of IPC), in Crime No.112 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the de facto complainant, one https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 14686 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 5 Thilak, as well as the petitioner and the other accused persons, are all Sri Lankan refugees. Due to prior enmity between the de facto complainant and the first accused, the petitioner, along with the other accused, allegedly attacked the de facto complainant with deadly weapons. Hence, this case was registered. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that he is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and there is no previous case pending against the petitioner. However, opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. I have given my anxious consideration to either side submissions. 6. Taking into consideration the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and there is no previous cases pending against him, this Court is of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required and is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 14686 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 5 certain conditions. 7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Sathyamangalam, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further conditions: (a) If the petitioner(s) fails to surrender before the concerned learned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled; (b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity; (c) The petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation; (d) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioner(s) in accordance with law as if the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 14686 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 5 conditions have been imposed and the petitioner(s) released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; (e) If the petitioner(s) thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS Act. 11-06-2026 GBI To 1.The Inspector of Police, Sathyamangalam Police Station, Erode District. 2.The Judicial Magistrate Court, Sathyamangalam. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 14686 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 5 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. GBI CRL OP No. 14686 of 2026 11-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis