Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36673 (PAT)

MAYA NAND MISHRA v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./43126/2021 · 2026-02-03

Sandeep Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43126 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-173 Year-2019 Thana- BHAIRAVSHTHAN District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1. MAYA NAND MISHRA SON OF SURYA NARAYAN MISHRA R/O VILLAGE- PATTI TOLA, P.S- BHAIRAV ASTHAN, DIST- MADHUBANI 2. RANJU DEVI @ RANJU MISHRA W/O MAYA NAND MISHRA R/O VILLAGE- PATTI TOLA, P.S- BHAIRAV ASTHAN, DIST- MADHUBANI 3. NILESH MISHRA @ N. MISHRA SON OF MAYA NAND MISHRA R/O VILLAGE- PATTI TOLA, P.S- BHAIRAV ASTHAN, DIST- MADHUBANI 4. SARITA MISHRA @ SARITA D/O MAYA NAND MISHRA R/O VILLAGE- PATTI TOLA, P.S- BHAIRAV ASTHAN, DIST- MADHUBANI 5. ARTI MISHRA @ ARTI W/O AKHILESH JHA D/O MAYA NAND MISHRA R/O VILLAGE- PATTI TOLA, P.S- BHAIRAV ASTHAN, DIST- MADHUBANI 6. NEETA MISHRA @ NEETA W/O SANJEEV MISHRA D/O MAYA NAND MISHRA R/O VILLAGE- BADHARA, P.S- RAJ NAGAR, DIST- MADHUBANI 7. SANJEEV MISHRA @ SANJEEV SON OF SHRAVAN MISHRA R/O VILLAGE- BADHARA, P.S- RAJNAGAR, DIST- MADHUBANI ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar BIHAR 2. NILU KUMARI WIFE OF KAMLESH KUMAR MISHRA D/O ANIL KUMAR JHA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- NAVTOLA, P.S- LAKHNOUR (R.S-O.P) , DISTRICT- MADHUBANI ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pandey No.5 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.A.G. For the O.P. No. 02 : Mr. Krishna Chandra. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 5 03-02-2026 Heard the parties. 2. This application has been filed for quashing of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43126 of 2021(5) dt.03-02-2026 2/2 FIR bearing Bhairav Asthan P.S. Case No. 173 of 2019 registered for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 354, 379, 498(A), 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. 3. It has very fairly been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that during pendency of this quashing application, the investigation of this case has been concluded and charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. 4. In view of the above, this application has become infructuous and accordingly, this application is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to raise all the grounds at an appropriate stage. Vikas/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U