- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010559222026 NC: 2026:KHC:45393 WP No. 25516 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 25516 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. THIMMARAJU S/O. LATE. RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT. BASAVANAHALLI VILLAGE, KYASHAVARA POST, HOLAVANAHALLI HOBLI, KORATAGERE TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572121. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HEGDE SHRIPAD GANGADHAR, ADV.) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER TUMAKURU DISTRICT, TUMAKURU-572101. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, MADHUGIRI SUB-DIVISION, MADHUGIRI, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572132. 3. THE TAHASILDAR, KORATAGERE TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572121. 4. SRI. VENKATESHAIAH, S/O. LATE. VENKATARAMAIAH @ NYATHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/AT BASAVANAHALLI VILLAGE, Digitally signed by NANJUNDACHARI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010559222026 NC: 2026:KHC:45393 WP No. 25516 of 2026 KYASHAVARA POST, HOLAVANAHALLI HOBLI, KORATAGERE TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572121. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP FOR R1 TO 3) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDERS BEARING NO. RP NO. 247/2025 DATED 18.06.2026 PASSED BY THE R1 AND THE ORDER BEARING NO. RA NO. 242/2024 DATED 28.07.2025 PASSED BY THE R2 AS PER ANNX- A AND B AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned HCGP accepts notice for respondents No.1 to 3. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. In this petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 12.06.2026/18.06.2026 and order dated 28.07.2025 (Annexures-A and B respectively) passed by respondent- authorities. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010559222026 NC: 2026:KHC:45393 WP No. 25516 of 2026 4. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on careful consideration of the impugned orders, the petitioner herein has challenged the mutation entries after a period of 15 years. It is also forthcoming from the finding recorded by the respondent-authorities would indicate that M.R.No.1/07-08 was challenged after 15 years. 5. In that view of the matter, it is for the petitioner to establish his right over the land in question by approaching the Competent Civil Court. No interference is called for in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is rejected. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE MPK CT:bms List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34