Date of reserved : --------------- Date of pronounced : 22.06.2026 Date of uploaded : 01.07.2026 APHC010722042022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3548] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 42580/2022 Between: 1. PILLA BHAGAVAN PATRUDU, S/O PILLA HAD PRASAD, AGE 38 YEARS, RESIDENT OF RAJA VEEDHI, DENKADA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, AADHAR NO. 9552 7041 9460 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE ASST COMMISSIONER OF POLICE NORTH ZONE, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POTHINA MALAYYA PALEM POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. SRIVATSAVAYA APPALA NARASIMHA RAJU, AGE 60 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D. NO. 5-113-2/6/2, NORTH EXTENSION, SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent no.3 and 4 harassing/ threating the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent no.3 and 4 not to harass the Petitioner by makings calls and calling him to the Police Station and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent no.3 and 4 not to harass the Petitioner by calling him to the Police Station till pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BANKA NAGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Mr.Joga Rao, learned counsel representing Mr.B.Nageswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, reported to the Court that the Writ Petition has become infructuous due to efflux of time. 2. Considering the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 3. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA, J Date : 22-06-2026 BMS Whether the order is: Speaking ☑ Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable ☑