CRWP-10148 IN T (113) SIMRANJEE STATE OF H CORAM: H Present: NEERJA K. 1. Th Constitution 3 to ensure p of responden petitioners. 2. Learn are major an certificate is being threat Resultantly, made to res Haryana for p 10148-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ CHANDIGAR CRWP Date o NJEET KAUR AND ANOTHER Versus OF HARYANA AND OTHERS M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEER Mr. Kuldeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, AAG, Har **** JA K. KALSON, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been fi tution of India seeking issuance of dire sure protection of the life and liberty o ondents No. 4 to 5 and not to interfer Learned counsel for the petitioners s jor and have performed marriage on ate is annexed as Annexure P-3. Eve threatened with dire consequences antly, a representation dated 07.08.2 respondent No.2- Superintenden for protection of their lives and libe -1- PUNJAB & HARYANA AT IGARH CRWP-10148-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 24.08.2026 ......PETITIONERS .....RESPONDENTS NEERJA K. KALSON G, Haryana een filed under Articles 226 of the of directions to respondents No. 2 and berty of the petitioners from the hands nterfere in the matrimonial life of the ners submits that both the petitioners ge on 06.08.2026. Copy of marriage 3. Ever since then, the petitioners are ences by the private respondents. .08.2026 (Annexure P-4) was also tendent of Police, Yamuna Nagar d liberty but in vain. Learned counsel of the 2 and hands of the ioners rriage rs are dents. s also agar, ounsel ATUL KUMAR TRIPATHI 2026.08.24 17:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-10148-2026 -2- submits that he would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondents No. 2 and 3 to look into their representation and take appropriate steps at the earliest. 3. Notice of motion to official respondents. 4. Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, AAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. 5. In view of above, petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondents No. 2 to provide necessary protection to the petitioners after considering threat perceptions to their life and liberty and to ensure that the life and liberty of the petitioners is not jeopardized at the hands of the private respondents. However, this direction will not validate the marriage said to have taken place between the parties and will have no effect on any civil or criminal action, which could be initiated in the matter in accordance with law. 6. Pending misc. application (s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (NEERJA K. KALSON) JUDGE 24.08.2026 Atul 1. Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No 2. Whether reportable Yes/No ATUL KUMAR TRIPATHI 2026.08.24 17:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document