GAURAV BANSAL v. CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION AND OTHERS
CWP/23511/2026 · 2026-08-12
Sudeepti Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 36667 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 36667 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-23511-2026 (O&M) -1- 142 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-23511-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.08.2026 Gaurav Bansal ......Petitioner Vs. Central Board of Secondary Education and others ......Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Ms. Rishita Neev, Advocate, for Mr. Himanshu Joshi, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA
J. (ORAL)
1. The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking directions to respondents No.1 and 2 to decide the representation dated 01.07.2026 and to update/correct the online records, digital database, verification portal, DigiLocker linked records and all electronic records of the Central Board of Secondary Education pertaining to the petitioner by reflecting the name of the petitioner’s father as “Ravinder Kumar” instead of “Ravi Kumar” in terms of the order dated 22.08.2024 passed by this Court in CWP-14624-2024.
2. Notice of motion.
3. On asking of the Court, Mr. Beant Singh Seemar, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and submits that the grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition has now been redressed.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the same.
VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2026.08.12 17:39 I agree to specified portions of this document
CWP-23511-2026 (O&M) -2-
5. In view of the above, the present writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
6. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(SUDEEPTI SHARMA)
JUDGE 12.08.2026 Virender
Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2026.08.12 17:39 I agree to specified portions of this document