FAYAZ AHMED BHAT v. UT OF J AND K TH SUPERINTENDENT DISTRICT JAIL AMBPHALLA AND ANOTHER
Crl A(D)/17/2025 · 2026-10-09
Ma Chowdhary, Sanjeev Kumar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3664 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3664 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Crl A(D) No. 17/2025
Fayaz Ahmed Bhat .....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through :- Ms. Shamima Jan, Advocate
v/s UT of J&K and Another .....Respondent(s)
Through :- Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG with Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Advocate
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MA CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
ORDER 09.10.2026
Having argued for some time, learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this appeal with liberty to file fresh bail application after some more material witnesses are recorded. It is submitted that at the time when this appeal was filed, only nine witnesses had been examined, but during the pendency of this appeal, 11 more witnesses have been examined. Be that as it may, in view of the request made, this appeal is permitted to be withdrawn. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Needless to say that in case a fresh bail application is presented before the trial Court, the same shall be considered purely on its own merits and in the light of evidence recorded without the trial Court being prejudiced by the observations made in the order impugned.
(MA Chowdhary) (Sanjeev Kumar) Judge Judge
JAMMU 09.10.2026 Manik
Sr. No. 02