RAJAT MADAN v. DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF GST INTELLIGENCE HQ
W.P.(CRL)/1261/2026 · 2026-04-20
Manoj Jain
Writ Petition (Criminal)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3664 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3664 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.(CRL) 1261/2026
1
$~110 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1261/2026 & CRL.M.A. 12185-12186/2026
RAJAT MADAN
.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Yatharth Rohila with Mr. Nihal
Singh, Ms. Kanak Kaushal and
Mr. Abhishek Juneja, Advocates. versus
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF GST INTELLIGENCE HQ .....Respondent Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, SSC with
Mr. Jatin Kumar Gaur, Advocate. CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R %
20.04.2026
1. Petitioner seeks modification with respect to the condition imposed upon him while he was enlarged on bail. 2. Bail order is dated 28.03.2025 and he submits that while granting him bail, the learned Trial Court had, inter alia, directed him not to leave the country without permission of the Court and to surrender his passport. He submits that the passport has already been surrendered but in past whenever any application was moved seeking permission to go abroad, these applications took lot of time in disposal. He has made reference to the three such applications which he had moved earlier on 31.10.2025, 23.12.2025 and
23.02.2026. 3. During the course of arguments, he submitted that even if the condition This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/04/2026 at 13:05:53
W.P.(CRL) 1261/2026
2
is not relaxed or modified, he would be left with no grievance if the learned Trial Court is requested to dispose of any such future application in a time-bound manner. He submits that on account of delay, either the purpose of visit gets frustrated or there is difficulty in obtaining Visa. 4. Keeping in mind the overall facts of the case and, as prayed above, the petition is disposed of as not pressed with the direction to learned Trial Court that as and when any such application is filed, reply be sought quickly and endeavour be made to dispose of the application within ten working days of its filing. 5. The petition stands disposed of in aforesaid terms. 6. A copy of this order be sent to learned Trial Court for information and compliance. 7. Pending applications also stand disposed of. MANOJ JAIN, J APRIL 20, 2026 st/js This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/04/2026 at 13:05:53