Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36625 (MAD)

R. Dhanasekaran v. The Superintendent of Police

WP Crl./842/2026 · 2026-06-16

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP Crl. No. 842 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN WP Crl. No. 842 of 2026 R. Dhanasekaran S/o.Rajendran ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Superintendent of Police Salem District, Salem. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Aathur Sub Division, Aathur, Salem District. 3. The Inspector of Police Aathur Town Police Station, Aathur, Salem District. 4. The Inspector of Police All Women Police Station, Aathur, Salem District. 5. Thirunavukarasu ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent herein who in turn shall issue necessary direction to the 3rd respondent police to take appropriate action as against the 5th respondent herein on the petitioner’s representation dt.19.01.2026 made to the 3rd respondent on the basis of the petitioners representation dt.28.01.2026 submitted to the 1st respondent. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 842 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Kannan For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) – R1 to R4 ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed for a direction, directing the 1st respondent herein, who in turn shall issue necessary direction to the 3rd respondent police to take appropriate action as against the 5th respondent herein on the petitioner’s representation dt.19.01.2026 made to the 3rd respondent on the basis of the petitioners representation dt.28.01.2026 submitted to the 1st respondent in person. 2.Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the petitioner is not cooperating for the enquiry. 3. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the writ petition, the 3rd respondent is hereby directed to conduct an enquiry on the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 19.01.2026, after issuing notice to the petitioner and to the 5th respondent, and to dispose of the same, within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 842 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 4. With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 16-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No kas To 1. The Superintendent of Police Salem District, Salem. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Aathur Sub Division, Aathur, Salem District. 3. The Inspector of Police Aathur Town Police Station, Aathur, Salem District. 4. The Inspector of Police All Women Police Station, Aathur, Salem District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 842 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. kas WP Crl. No. 842 of 2026 16-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis