Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36624 (CAL)

SALMAN AKTAR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRM (A)/2512/2026 · 2026-08-28

Md Shabbar Rashidi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

28.08.2026 Serial no. 4 Anticipatory bail [Rejected] Dd In the High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdictional Appellate Side CRM (A)/2512/2026 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure corresponding to Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Nadanghat Police Station Case No. 292 of 2026 dated 19.06.2026 under Sections 6 of the POCSO Act in Special Case (POCSO) No. 33 of 2026. -And- In the matter of : SALMAN AKTAR … …Petitioner Mr. Subrata Bhattacharya, Advocate … … For the Petitioner Mr. Subhabrata Chowdhury, Advocate Mr. Supriya Mahajan, Advocate … …For the State 1. Memo of Evidence filed in Court be taken on record. 2. The petitioner is alleged to have committed sexual assault upon the victim who is a minor girl. 3. I have gone through the materials in the case diary including the statements of the victim recorded under Section 183 of BNSS, 2023. In such statements the victim has implicated the present petitioner for committing forcible sexual assault upon her. 4. In such circumstances, considering the nature and gravity of the offence and the materials in the case dairy, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. 6. CRM (A)/2512/2026 is dismissed. (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)