IN THE 126. Union Territory Harpreet Kaur a 127. Union Territory Ramninder Kau 128. Union Territory Manjeet Singh a CORAM:- HO HO Present: Mr Mr for HARSIMRAN 1. Pre the heading, inv THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGAR CW Da rritory, Chandigarh and others Versus Kaur and others CW rritory, Chandigarh and others Versus r Kaur and others CW rritory, Chandigarh and others Versus ingh and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAR Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate, and Mr. Abhishek Kumar Premi, Advoc for the petitioners. ----- RAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) Present bunch of petitions, the det g, involve common point of law and c NJAB & HARYANA IGARH CWP-23596-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 12.08.2026 ... Petitioners ... Respondents CWP-23598-2026 ... Petitioners ... Respondents CWP-23599-2026 ... Petitioners ... Respondents HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL e, and Advocate, he details of which are mentioned in and common set of facts, hence, ned in SANJEEV KUMAR 2026.08.17 12:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-23596-2026 (O&M) - 2 - they are being dealt together. For the sake of convenience, the facts are being taken from CWP-23596-2026. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners-Chandigarh Administration argues that despite a clear direction given by this Court vide order dated 17.02.2026 passed in CWP No.4730 of 2026 and other connected cases, to the Tribunal to decide the issue within a period of three months from the next date of hearing, the same has been ignored and the case has been adjourned even beyond three months. Learned counsel further submits that the case was not even taken up for consideration on the date concerned which is causing prejudice to the Chandigarh Administration. 2. The prayer of the petitioners is that let the Tribunal decide the issue finally on the next date of hearing, so that the prejudice suffered by the Chandigarh Administration keeping in view the interim order granted, comes to an end. 3. Though, keeping in view the order passed by this Court, the matter should have been decided within the time frame granted, but keeping in view the workload, in case the Original Applications (OAs) have been adjourned now to 28.09.2026, let the said issue be decided even if, the OAs to be heard out of turn by giving preference to the hearing upon other cases, keeping in view the fact that there is an interim order which is being suffered by the Chandigarh Administration. In case, it is not possible to decide the issue on the date fixed i.e. 28.09.2026, the hearing will be completed within a period of four SANJEEV KUMAR 2026.08.17 12:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-23596-2026 (O&M) - 3 - weeks from the said date by the Tribunal. In case, the same is not done, the petitioner will be free to approach this Court for appropriate relief. 4. Disposed of accordingly. 5. Civil Misc. application(s) pending, if any, shall also stand disposed of. 6. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of other connected case(s). (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE 12.08.2026 sanjeev Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No SANJEEV KUMAR 2026.08.17 12:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document