Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3661 (RAJ)

HERO HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED v. SHAYAM SINGH S/O SHRI HARBANS SINGH

CW/690/2026 · 2026-02-24

Anuroop Singhi

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:8580] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 690/2026 Hero Housing Finance Limited, Registered Office At 9 Community Center, Bansant Lok, Basant Vihar, New Delhi Through Authorized Officer Dhirendra Singh ----Petitioner/Applicant Versus 1. Shayam Singh S/o Shri Harbans Singh, Address (1) Plot No-02 Misal No-2 Panchayat Samiti Mundoti, Village Sekhpura, Bharatpur (2) Railway Protection Special Force, 6th BN/ RPFS Dayabasti, New Delhi (3) Bajaheda Mundoti Bharatpur. 2. Harbansh S/o Shri Nandram, Address (1) Plot No-02 Misal No-2 Panchayat Samiti Mundoti, Village Sekhpura, Bharatpur (2)Bajaheda Mundoti Bharatpur. 3. Sunita W/o Shri Shayam Singh, Address (1) Plot No-02 Misal No-2 Panchayat Samiti Mundoti, Village Sekhpura, Bharatpur (2)Bajaheda Mundoti Bharatpur. ----Respondents/Non-Applicant For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pramod Kumar For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 24/02/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:- “It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that Your Lordships may graciously be pleased to admit and allow this writ petition and - a) By an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof, the Chief Judicial Magistrate Bharatpur may kindly be directed to decide the pending Application filed by the petitioner under section 14 of the Act 2002 within a period of 15 [2026:RJ-JP:8580] (2 of 2) [CW-690/2026] days from the presentation of certified copy of the order so passed by this Hon’ble Court. b) Any other order or direction, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper, be also passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Mr. Pramod Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said application under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred as ‘the Act of 2002’) was filed on 03.02.2025 before the Court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bharatpur. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that for one reason or another, the said application has remained pending for more than one year, whereas in terms of the provisions of Section 14(1) of the Act of 2002, an order on the said application is required to be passed within a period of 30 days from the date of filing of the application, which can be extended, but not beyond 60 days. 4. Taking note of the aforesaid submissions, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the concerned Court to decide the said application within a period of 30 days from today, positively, by passing a speaking and reasoned order strictly in accordance with law. 5. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. 6. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J VINAY /52