Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3661 (CAL)

APARNA MANDAL v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

CRM (SB)/43/2024 · 2026-01-28

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

M/L 622 28.01.2026 Bpg. C.R.M. (SB) 43 of 2024 In Re: An application for cancellation of bail under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; Mrs Aparna Mandal Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors. Ms. Snigdha Saha. …for the State. None appears for the petitioner/applicant. Learned advocate for the State has submitted a report. Let the report be kept with the record. Having considered the period which has lapsed and the nature of the report submitted before this Court, at this stage, I find no scope for interference. If circumstances so demand, petitioner would be at liberty to take out a fresh application before the jurisdictional court. With the aforesaid observations, CRM(SB) 43 of 2024 is disposed of. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) 2