HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 6379 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Ms. Sameksha Agarwal, learned counsel for petitioners, Sri Dhananjay Awasthi, Advocate for Respondent-3 and Ms. Pooja Agarwal, Advocate for Respondent-4. 2. The writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioners to file independent writ petitions since it is filed by as many as 39 petitioners, therefore, facts are jumbled. 3. This order will not come in way if petitioners move independent representations ventilating their respective grievance for benefit of DACP Scheme before concerned respondent for consideration, so that it may be considered by Competent Authority. May 7, 2026 AK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sameksha Agarwal, Sunil Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Chandan Sharma, Dhananjay Awasthi, Pooja Agarwal (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Dr Sandeep Kumar Chaudhary And 38 Others .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad