[2026:RJ-JP:10895] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2063/2026 Sumit S/o Chotelal, R/o Bhodhan, Thana Singhana, Dist. Jhunjhunu (Raj.) (Accused At Presently Confined In Khetri). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor, Khetri Raj. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Omveer Singh Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 16/03/2026 1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 221/2025 registered at Police Station Singhana, District Jhunjhunu for the offence(s) under Sections 3/25, 5/25 Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; he is in custody since long; recovery has already been effected; He further submits that co-accused Amit Kumar has been enlarged on bail by the trial Court itself; conclusion of trial may take a long time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner hereinabove and submits that three criminal antecedents are against the accused-petitioner. [2026:RJ-JP:10895] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2063/2026] 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that recovery has already been effected; petitioner is behind the bars since long; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Sumit S/o Chotelal is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not be involved in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence on 1st and 15th day of every month in the concerned police station. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J SHIVANI/74