Date of reserved for orders: Date of pronouncement : 24.06.2026 Date of uploading : 01.07.2026 APHC010228942021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 13073/2021 Between: 1. KOMANAPALLI KOMANAPALLI RAJENDRA SINGH,, S/O LATE KRUPANANDHAM, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, REP. BY HIS GPA HOLDER ADIDELA SUNDAR SINGH, R/O D.NO.1 SECTOR-I, MVP COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. ADIDELA SUNDAR SINGH ( DIED ) AS PER L.R P5, S/O JESHU DAS, AGED ABOUT 67 R/O D.NO.1 COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. KORADA APPALAKONDA, W/O KORADA AMMATALLI, AGED 65 YEARS, R/O D.NO.1 MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. SUKESHNI PRIYA,, D/O LATE V.RAMA RAO, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O SC AND BC COLONY, OPP.COMMUNITY HALL, CHINAMUSHIDIWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM 5. ADIDELA YEMIMA SINGH, W/O ADID YEARS, RESIDING AT D.NO.1 COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM BROUGHT ON RECORD AS L.R OF THE DECEASED 2ND PETITIONER AS PER THE COURT'S ORDER DT.19.11.2025 IN I.A.NO.02 OF 2025 24.06.2026 01.07.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 13073/2021 KOMANAPALLI KOMANAPALLI RAJENDRA SINGH,, S/O LATE KRUPANANDHAM, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, REP. BY HIS GPA HOLDER ADIDELA SUNDAR SINGH, R/O D.NO.1-50-1/C, MIG I, MVP COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM. ADIDELA SUNDAR SINGH ( DIED ) AS PER L.R P5, S/O JESHU DAS, AGED ABOUT 67 R/O D.NO.1-50-1/C, MIG-72, SECTOR COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM. KORADA APPALAKONDA, W/O KORADA AMMATALLI, AGED 65 YEARS, R/O D.NO.1-50/3, PURUSHOTHAPURAM, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. SUKESHNI PRIYA,, D/O LATE V.RAMA RAO, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O SC AND BC COLONY, OPP.COMMUNITY HALL, CHINAMUSHIDIWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM ADIDELA YEMIMA SINGH, W/O ADIDELA SUNDAR SINGH, 69 YEARS, RESIDING AT D.NO.1-50-1/1, M.I.G-72, SECTOR 1, M.V.P. COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM -530 017. PETITIONER NO.5 IS BROUGHT ON RECORD AS L.R OF THE DECEASED 2ND PETITIONER AS PER THE COURT'S ORDER DT.19.11.2025 IN ...PETITIONER(S) IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE KOMANAPALLI KOMANAPALLI RAJENDRA SINGH,, S/O LATE KRUPANANDHAM, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, REP. BY HIS GPA 1/C, MIG-72, ADIDELA SUNDAR SINGH ( DIED ) AS PER L.R P5, S/O JESHU DAS, 72, SECTOR-I, MVP KORADA APPALAKONDA, W/O KORADA AMMATALLI, AGED 65 50/3, PURUSHOTHAPURAM, PENDURTHI SUKESHNI PRIYA,, D/O LATE V.RAMA RAO, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O SC AND BC COLONY, OPP.COMMUNITY HALL, ELA SUNDAR SINGH, 69 72, SECTOR 1, M.V.P. 530 017. PETITIONER NO.5 IS BROUGHT ON RECORD AS L.R OF THE DECEASED 2ND PETITIONER AS PER THE COURT'S ORDER DT.19.11.2025 IN ..PETITIONER(S) 2 AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT E(IUILDINGS,VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. VISAKHAPATNAM METROPOLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) REP. BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. M/S RAVITEJ CONSTRUCTIONS, REP.BY ITS MANAGING PARTNERS MR. G. NAGESWARA RAO AND MR. V. VENKATA SUBRAHMANYA MALLIKARJUNA RAO HAVING OFFICE AT D.NO.49-8-3, LALITHANAGAR, AKKAYYAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM, 5. THE TAHSILDAR, PENDURTHI MANDAL, PENDURTHI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or direction or any other proceedings more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the actions of the 2nd respondent in causing inordinate delay in acting upon the representation of the petitioners dated 21.08.2015 and in not cancelling the layout permission granted in L.P.No.30/2004 for an extent of Ac.24.95 cents in Sy.No.179/2 of Chinamushidiwada(V), Pendurthi(M) along with building permissions granted therein that have been obtained by fraud, in spite of furnishing documents disproving the title of the 4th respondent and its predecessors as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequentially- a) direct the respondents to cancel the lay-out permission granted to the 4th respondent vide L.P.No.30/2004 for an extent of Ac 24.95 cents covered in Sy.No.179/2 of Chinamushidiwada(V), Pendurthi(M), Visakhapatnam District along with building permissions granted therein, in the light of the documents furnished by the petitioners, particularly Settlement Patta No.589 and Revenue Records, b) fix a time frame for disposing the application of the petitioners made for 3 cancellation of layout permission granted in L.P.No.30/2004 for an extent of Ac 24.95 cents covered in Sy.No.179/2 of Chinamushidiwada(V), Pendurthi(M). IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to consider and initiate action upon the representation of the petitioners dated 17.04.2021 made for cancellation of lay-out permission granted to the 4th respondent in L.P.No.30/2004 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to the petitioner/4th Respondent to file counter affidavit in the above writ petition No.13073 of 2021 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to implead the petitioners as proposed respondents NO.6 to 9 who are proper and necessary parties as they are legal heirs to entitled the lands in an extent of Ac.25-95 cents in New Sy.No. 179/2 by virtue of registered will deed executed in favour of father of the petitioner herein late Jada Samson Vijayakumar and their paternal uncle late Jada Samuel Vijayakumar by their grand mother late R J Paul in the above writ petition i.e. WP 13073 of 2021 as well as in the interlocutory applications to bring the facts of the case in their favour and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to allow the petitioner / LR of Writ Petitioner No.2 herein to come on record as Writ Petitioner No.5 in W.P. No. 13073 of 2021 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. MEKA RAHUL CHOWDARY 4 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI 2. Somisetty Ganesh Babu SC For VUDA and MUDA 3. J.V.PHANIDUTH 4. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV The Court made the following: 5 Order:- The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are the owners of the property which forms the subject matter of the writ petition and that they have challenged the layout permission granted in favour of the 4th respondent. 2. It is submitted that the petitioners in W.P.No.11503 of 2001 had challenged the orders of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapatnam, cancelling the pattadar pass books granted in favour of one R.J. Paul. 3. The learned Division Bench of this Court disposed of the said writ petition vide order dated 23.02.2024, leaving it open to respondent Nos.1 to 6 to file fresh appeals before the Revenue Divisional Officer. The Revenue Divisional Officer shall consider the appeals in accordance with law after issuing due notice and hearing. It is submitted that the grievance of the petitioners can be adjudicated by the 2nd respondent, who is the competent authority, as the orders of this Court have become final. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents also accepts the proposal for disposing of the writ petition by remanding the matter to the 2nd respondent for considering the grievance of the petitioners. The 2nd respondent shall issue notice to all concerned and grant an opportunity of hearing to all concerned before passing appropriate final orders within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 6. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 24.06.2026 PNS Whether the order is: Speaking Reasoned ☑ Reportable Non-reportable ☑