Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:10859] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No. 4000/2026 Monu S/o Pyarelal, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Olvada, Police Station Kundera, District Sawai Madhopur. (At Present Confined In District Jail Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Jain For Respondent(s) : Ms. Aarti Sharma, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 16/03/2026
1. The petitioner has filed this second bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.189/2025 registered with the Police Station Rawanjana Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur for offence under Sections 318(4), 336(3) and 338 of B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 66C and 66D of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 and Section 13 of the Rajasthan Public Gambling Ordinance, 1949.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he is in custody since long. Learned counsel further submits that the Police after completion of investigation, has submitted charge- sheet in the matter and the petitioner is no more required for any kind of interrogation or recovery. Learned counsel further submits that trial of the case is likely to take considerable time to
[2026:RJ-JP:10859] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4000/2026] conclude, therefore, the petitioner may be released on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed this second bail application.
4. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor.
5. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, so also the fact that the Police after completion of investigation, has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and the accused-petitioner is in custody since long, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, this second bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
7. However, it is made clear that in case the accused- petitioner is found to be involved in any other criminal case of similar nature in future, the prosecution may move an application for cancellation of this bail.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /10