Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3658 (CHH)

Ms Escab Technoxpert v. Union of India

ARBR/24/2026 · 2026-04-05

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:15552 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ARBR No. 24 of 2026 Ms Escab Technoxpert S/o Proprietor- Avinash Kumar Shukla. S/o Late Motilal Shukla, Aged About 64 Years, R/o Ward No 08, Pandav Nagar Shahdol, Police Station Shahdol, Dist-Shahdol (MP), ... Applicant versus 1. Union of India Through Its General Manager South East Central Railway, Bilaspur (C.G.), 2. The Dy. General Manager (G) South East Central Railway, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. Sr. Divisional Engineer (Central) South East Central Railway, Bilaspur, Dist- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Applicant : Mr. H.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate. For Respondents/UOI : Mr. Ramakant Mishra, Deputy Solicitor General. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 06 .04.2026 1. Heard Mr. H.S. Ahluwalia, learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Also heard Mr. Ramakant Mishra, learned Deputy Solicitor General for the respondents/UoI. 2. This is an application under Section 11(6) read with Section 14 and Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for termination of mandate and substitution of Arbitrator. PREETI KUMARI Digitally signed by PREETI KUMARI Date: 2026.04.08 11:53:14 +0530 2 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he seeks to withdraw the present application, with liberty to file an appropriate application before the competent Court, as defined under Section 2(1)(e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection. 5. In view of the above, the present arbitration request petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. Sd/-- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Preeti