IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44623 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-322 Year-2023 Thana- HARSIDHI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Deepak Kumar Son of Amirilal Sah @ Amirilal R/o village - Semara Khas, P.S.- Turkauliya, Dist.- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhannjay Kumar Ii For the State : Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 4 10-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. This is the second attempt on behalf of the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 322 of 2023 registered for the offence under Sections 395, 397 of the IPC and 28(1-b)a, 27 of the Arms Act. 3. Earlier, the bail application of the petitioner has been rejected by this Court vide order dated 04.09.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 59284 of 2024, which reads as under: “Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 322 of 2023 registered for the offence under Sections 395, 397 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 25(1-b)a, 27 of the Arms Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, some gold and silver jewellary was looted from a jewellar when Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44623 of 2025(4) dt.10-02-2026 2/2 he was going back to his home after closing his shop. 4. One Vishnu Kumar was arrested and he has made a self-inculpatory statement and has named the petitioner. At the instance of Vishnu Kumar, looted articles have been recovered. 5. The petitioner is in custody since 11.10.2023. 6. Considering the gravity of the offence, nature of allegations levelled against the petitioner, likelihood of the petitioner to commit further offence and the antecedent of the petitioner which includes cases of murder and loot, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. 8. The Court below is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner and conclude the same at the earliest.” 4. The charge has been framed and trial is already started. 5. Considering the above facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to review my earlier order.. 6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. priyanka/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T