DIPRANJAN GOGOI AND DEEP GOGOI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
AB/690/2026 · 2026-04-06
Pranjal Das
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3657 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3657 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010065022026
2026:GAU-AS:5169
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/690/2026 DIPRANJAN GOGOI AND DEEP GOGOI SON OF LATE UMESH GOGOI,R/O- VILL- NILAKH PALENGI, NO.2 NILAKH KONCH GAON, SILAPATHAR, DIST- DHEMAJI.
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT SADILAPUR, JALUKBARI, P.S.-JALUKBARI, DIST- KAMRUP(M), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T CHUTIA, MS S NASRAT Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER 07.04.2026
1. Heard Mr. T. Chutia, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor.
2. This petition under Section 482 BNSS is filed by the petitioner, namely, Dipranjan Gogoi @ Deep Gogoi, apprehending arrest in connection with Jalukbari P.S. Case No. 88/2026 registered u/s
Page No.# 2/2 118/126(2)/3(5) /351/352 of BNS.
3. The allegations in the FIR dated 13/3/26 is that on the night of 4th March 2026, the informant was returning from Greenwood Resort and on the way one Deep Gogoi the present petitioner started abusing his wife. Subsequently, when he stopped his vehicle on the roadside to answer nature's call, the said person who was following him was heavily intoxicated and then he suddenly took out an iron rod and attacked him brutally. It is alleged that he struck him repeatedly leading to fracture.
4. The case diary has been received.
5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the medical report indicates grievous injury suggestive of fracture thereby lending support to the allegation made in the FIR. The I.O. has also submitted bail objection.
6. It is submitted by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor that in the statement of one of the witnesses has been stated that the witness saw the accused, chasing the victim with a lathi in his hand.
7. In that circumstances, I do not find sufficient justification to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail at this stage,especially as investigation is still in progress.
8. Therefore, at this stage, the bail petition stands rejected.
9. Return back to the case file.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant