CRWP-9668-20 IN THE H (119 ) PINKI AND AN STATE OF HAR CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Mr. MANISHA BAT 1. The Constitution of In official responde petitioners at the representation da 2. At t submitted that t 05.05.2026 befor raising their grie has not yet been further submitted appropriate direc 2026 (O&M) (1) HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AN CHANDIGARH CR Dat D ANOTHER Versus F HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANI Mr. Gursevak Singh, Advocate for t Mr. Ashok Kumar Khubbar, Addl. A **** BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed n of India seeking issuance of a writ o spondent Nos.2 and 3 to protect th at the hands of respondent Nos.4-5 a tion dated 05.08.2026 (Annexure P-5). At the very outset, learned couns that the petitioners have recently before the Superintendent of Police, ir grievances as mentioned in the pre t been considered and no action ha mitted that at this stage, the petition e directions are issued to respondent N AB AND HARYANA AT CRWP-9668-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 12.08.2026 ... Petitioners ...Respondents MANISHA BATRA te for the petitioners ddl. AG, Haryana n filed under Article 226 of the writ of mandamus directing the tect the life and liberty of the 5 and to take action on their 5). counsel for the petitioners has ently filed a representation on olice, Fatehabad (Annexure P-5) he present petition but the same has been taken thereon. He petitioners would be satisfied if dent No.2-Superintendent of AMIT SHARMA 2026.08.12 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-9668-20 Police, Fatehaba petitioners and ta 3. Noti 4. Mr. notice on behalf be done in due c him during the co 5. In v commenting any disposed of at th aforesaid represe within a period accordance with petitioners, the o in order to protec 12.08.2026 Amit Sharma 2026 (O&M) (2) tehabad to decide the aforesaid re and take necessary action thereon. Notice of motion. r. Ashok Kumar Khubbar, Addl, A ehalf of the respondents-State and su due course. Let a complete set of the the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made g anything on the merits of the cas f at this stage with a direction to resp epresentation dated 05.08.2026 (Annex eriod of 15 days from today, by pa with law. Needless to say, if an , the official respondents would provi protect their life and liberty. (MA Whether speaking/reasoned:- Ye representation filed by the Addl, AG, Haryana, has advance and submits that the needful will of the paperbook be supplied to made by the petitioners, without the case, the present petition is to respondent No.2 to decide the (Annexure P-5) of the petitioners by passing a speaking order in if any threat is found to the provide them adequate security (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.08.12 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.