Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36564 (CAL)

MADHUSUDAN ARI v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/2820/2026 · 2026-08-28

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

28.08.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.93 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. C.R.M. (A) 2820 of 2026 In Re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Patashpur Police Station Case No. 307 of 2026 dated 29.06.2026 (G.R.(E) Case No. 859 of 2026). And In Re : Madhusudan Ari ... Petitioner. Mr. Tapan Dutta Gupta, Ms. Rituparna Ghosh, Mr. Sourav Sardar ... For the Petitioner. Mr. Rajendra Banerjee, APP, Mr. Koustav Lal Mukherjee, Ms. Kritika Jain ... For the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that during pendency of the application, petitioner has been arrested. Consequently, the present application for anticipatory bail has become infructuous. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail being CRM (A) 2820 of 2026 is dismissed as infructuous. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)