[2026:RJ-JP:13207] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 480/2026 1. Ms. Komal Verma W/o Shri Vikas Verma D/o Shri Rajkumar Verma, Aged About 21 Years, Resident Of Post Raithal, Village Rampura Doogri Khurd, District Jaipur, At Present Resident Of Balai Mohalla, Harsoli, Police Station Kishangarh Renwal, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Vikas Verma S/o Shri Sultan Verma, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Balai Mohalla, Harsoli, Police Station Kishangarh Renwal, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Additional Chief Secretary Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Superintendent Of Police, District Jaipur Rural, Rajasthan. 3. Station House Officer, Police Station Kishangarh Renwal, District Jaipur Rural, Rajasthan. 4. Rajkumar Verma S/o Shri Nanakram Verma, Resident Of Balai Mohalla, Harsoli, Police Station Kishangarh Renwal, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 5. Nanakram Verma S/o Shri Raturam Verma, Resident Of Balai Mohalla, Harsoli, Police Station Kishangarh Renwal, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 6. Smt. Anita Devi W/o Shri Rajkuamr Verma, Resident Of Balai Mohalla, Harsoli, Police Station Kishangarh Renwal, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 7. Suresh Kumar Verma S/o Shri Nanakram Verma, Resident Of Balai Mohalla, Harsoli, Police Station Kishangarh Renwal, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 8. Smt. Suman Devi W/o Shri Suresh Kumar Verma, Resident Of Balai Mohalla, Harsoli, Police Station Kishangarh Renwal, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 9. Ajay Kumar Verma S/o Shri Rajkumar Verma, Resident Of Balai Mohalla, Harsoli, Police Station Kishangarh Renwal, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 10. Rahul Kumar Verma S/o Shri Suresh Kumar Verma, [2026:RJ-JP:13207] (2 of 3) [CRLW-480/2026] Resident Of Balai Mohalla, Harsoli, Police Station Kishangarh Renwal, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mamraj Jat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shriram Dhakad, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 28/03/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. 2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.4 to 10 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. It is submitted that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Arya Samaj, Moti Katala, Jaipur (Rajasthan) on 16.03.2026 and same has been registered on 16.03.2026. The certificate of registration of marriage of the petitioners is annexed with this petition. Counsel further submit that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos.4 to 10 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. [2026:RJ-JP:13207] (3 of 3) [CRLW-480/2026] 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.3-Station House Officer, Police Station Kishangarh Renwal, District Jaipur Rural, Rajasthan and respondent no.3 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /126