Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3656 (CHH)

RAJ SINGH BANJARE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1395/2026 · 2026-04-01

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:15216 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1395 of 2026 1 - Raj Singh Banjare S/o Pokhan Banjare Aged About 35 Years R/o Ward No. 8, Sambalpur, Janpad Panchayat Nawagarh, Tahsil Nawagarh, District Bemetara, C.G. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur, C.G. 2 - Collector Bemetara, District Bemetara, C.G. 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Nawagarh, District Bemetara, C.G. 4 - Tahsildar Nandghat, District Bemetara, C.G. 5 - Gram Panchayat Khapari Through- Sarpanch, Village Sambalpur, Tahsil Nawagarh, District Bemetara, C.G. ... Respondents (Cause title, as taken from CIS) For Petitioner For State/Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : : Ms. Reema Dubey, Advocate Mr. Anand Dadariya, Dy. Adv. General (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 02/04/2026 1. Heard. RUKHSAR BANO Digitally signed by RUKHSAR BANO Date: 2026.04.02 17:26:57 +0530 2 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in respect of the impugned notice dated 05.02.2026, the Tahsildar, Nandghat, District Bemetara (Respondent No.4) has passed a final order on 10.03.2026. Therefore, she seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to challenge the aforesaid order passed by respondent No.4. 3. Learned State counsel has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Prayer is allowed. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. 6. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) JUDGE Rukhsar