[2026:RJ-JP:14039] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 247/2019 Rameshwar Lal Choudhary S/o Panchu Ram Jat, Aged About 71 Years, Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Mangalwada, Police Station Dudu, Distt. Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Gramin Vikas Panchayati Raj Department Jaipur. 2. State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1082/2018 Charan Singh Jat S/o Shri Ranglal, Aged 41 Years, R/o Ganeshpura, Dudu, District Jaipur Rural, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary To Government, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Divisional Commissioner, Jaipur Division, Jaipur. 3. District Collector, Jaipur District Jaipur. 4. Sub Divisonal Officer, Dudu, District Jaipur. 5. Rameshwar Choudhary, Sarpanch, Village Panchayat Mangalwada Tehsil Mojmabad, District Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vimal Kumar Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 06/04/2026 1. By way of filing the instant petition i.e. S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No.247/2019, a challenge has been led to the impugned [2026:RJ-JP:14039] (2 of 2) [CRLW-247/2019] order dated 14.02.2019 passed by the Rural Development & Panchayati Raj Department (Panchayati Raj) wherein directions have been given for issuance of prosecution sanction against the petitioner. 2. At the very outset, learned Public Prosecutor apprised this Court that after investigation the Police has not submitted charge- sheet against the petitioner only on the technical ground that the case pertains to Prevention of Corruption and the local Police has no jurisdiction to investigate the matter, hence, ‘Negative’ report has been submitted narrating all these facts. Under the changed circumstances, the instant petition has become infructuous. He further submits that unless and until the Anti Corruption Bureau proceeds against the petitioner, the instant petition would be pre- mature and the same would not be maintainable. Hence, the same is liable to be rejected. 3. Considering the above, the instant petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to move an application for revival of the instant petition in S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No.247/2019, in case the matter is investigated by the Anti Corruption Bureau and in case the charge-sheet is submitted by the Anti Corruption Bureau against the petitioner. 4. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No.1082/2018 also stands disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Shivam-Puneet/13-14