CRM-M-20042- IN THE H (122) LIPSY SINGLA STATE OF PUNJ CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Mr. R MANISHA BATR 1. The 07.02.2026 and 20 as ‘Manoj Kumar had been cancelle warrants had been and proclamation p 2. It is a appearing before t the Trial Court, h appearance which -2026 (O&M) 1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH GLA Versus PUNJAB AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANIS Chahit Bansal, Advocate for the p Mr. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior DAG **** BATRA, J. (ORAL) The petitioner is seeking quashing and 20.02.2026 respectively passed i mar Vs. Lipsy Singla and others’ wh ncelled and bonds were forfeited to th d been ordered to be issued against him ation proceedings have been initiated It is argued by learned counsel for t efore the Learned Trial Court and whe ourt, he had been moving application which were allowed by the Learned T JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRM-M-20042-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 16.04.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondents ANISHA BATRA r the petitioner r DAG, Punjab ashing of order dated 06.01.2026, ssed in case NACT-225/2023 titled whereby the bail of the petitioner to the State and then non-bailable inst him vide order dated 20.02.2026 tiated against him. l for the petitioner that he had been d whenever he did not appear before ications for exempting his personal rned Trial Court. On 06.01.2026, he M) 2026 oner s 026, titled ioner lable 2026 been efore sonal 6, he AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.16 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-20042- was unable to app cancelled and bon proceedings have and mala fide bu disease and is als medical check-up Learned counsel proceedings befor conditions to be i deserves to be allo 3. This C considered the con 4. It is appearing regularl had been moving had been granted b since none had app exemption. Procl same was ordered petitioner has not b has adjourned the infirmity in the im willing to join the -2026 (O&M) 2 to appear before the Learned Trial Co nd bonds were forfeited to the State. have been initiated against him. Hi ide but due to the reason that he w is also having stones in his abdome up on routine basis. He had also unsel for the petitioner further subm before the Learned Trial Court an o be imposed upon him. It is, there be allowed. This Court has gone through the mat he contentions as raised by learned cou It is apparent from the record that egularly before the Learned Trial Co oving applications seeking exemptio anted by Learned Trial Court. On 06.0 ad appeared on his behalf neither any Proclamation proceedings had been rdered to be issued for 02.04.2026. s not been declared a proclaimed pers ed the case for 02.05.2026. This Cour the impugned order. However, sinc in the proceedings before the Learne rial Court due to which his bail was State. Subsequently, proclamation . His absence was not intentional he was suffering from some liver domen and had been going for his also been advised to take bed rest. submitted that he is ready to join and to abide by the terms and , therefore, argued that the petition material placed on record and has ed counsel for the petitioner. d that the petitioner had not been ial Court from quite some time and mption from his appearance which n 06.01.2026, his bail was cancelled er any application was moved for his been initiated against him and the .2026. It stands published but the d person so far, since the Trial Court ourt as such finds no illegality or r, since the petitioner is ready and earned Trial Court on regular basis was ation ional liver r his rest. join and tition has been and hich elled r his d the t the ourt ty or and basis AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.16 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-20042- and to abide by th disposed of. The Court within a pe fresh personal as Court and on depo Court, he shall be deposited by the Trial Court. 5. It is c dates of hearing b the Learned Trial C 6. A cop 16.04.2026 Amit Sharma -2026 (O&M) 3 by the terms and conditions to be imp . The petitioner is directed to surren n a period of 10 days from today. O al as well as surety bonds to the sat n depositing costs to the tune of Rs.25, all be admitted to bail by the Trial C y the petitioner shall be given to the t is clarified that if the petitioner rem ring before the Learned Trial Court, Trial Court shall be at liberty to cance copy of this order be sent to the Le (MA Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable:- Yes/No be imposed upon him, the petition is surrender before the Learned Trial ay. On his doing so and furnishing the satisfaction of the Learned Trial Rs.25,000/- before the Learned Trial ial Court. The amount of cost so to the complainant by the Learned er remains absent on the subsequent ourt, without any reasonable cause, cancel his bail. the Learned Trial Court. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE oned:- Yes/No es/No on is Trial hing Trial Trial st so rned uent ause, AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.16 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.