Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3653 (PAT)

Ramdeo Yadav v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./12029/2026 · 2026-03-17

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12029 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-512 Year-2025 Thana- HARNAUT District- Nalanda ====================================================== 1. Ramdeo Yadav S/O Late Mauji Yadav R/O Vill.- Manikpur, P.S- Harnaut, District- Nalanda 2. Baran Yadav @ Jayram Yadav S/O Ramdeo Yadav R/O Vil..- Manikpur P S Harnaut District Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Satya Prakash, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 17-03-2026 The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to Petitioenr No. 2 has already been dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 19.02.2026. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 3. Petitioner No. 1 apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S.. 4. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that on account of land dispute, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including this petitioner, assaulted informant and others with lathi, danda and bricks. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12029 of 2026(3) dt.17-03-2026 2/3 5. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. On account of admitted land dispute between the parties, simple maar-peet took place in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and no specific accusation of overt act has been alleged against this petitioner. Doctor has found the injuries, allegedly caused by this petitioner, simple in nature. Petitioner claims clean antecedents. 6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation, case and counter-case between the parties, nature of injuries allegedly caused by this petitioner and clean antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to Petitioner No. 1 is allowed. 8. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named Petitioner No. 1 be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12029 of 2026(3) dt.17-03-2026 3/3 each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-1st, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Harnaut P.S. Case No. 512 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T