In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh 135 CWP-26142-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:-18.08.2026 Duli Chand and another … Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present:- Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Addl.A.G., Haryana. ***** VIKAS BAHL , J.(Oral) 1. In the head-note of the petition, following prayers have been made:- “Civil Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari, quashing the impugned order dated 14.10.2009 (Annexure P-3) passed by respondent No.4, impugned order dated 28.01.2021 (Annexure P-12) passed by respondent No. 3 and the impugned order dated 07.01.2026 (Annexure P-14) passed by respondent No.2 being illegal, arbitrary, erroneous, unjust and against the evidence on record; AND During the pendency of the present writ petition, the operation of the impugned orders and dispossession of the petitioners from the suit land may kindly be stayed; AND/OR Issue any other writ, order or direction that this Hon'ble Court deems fit keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice.” GEETA RANI 2026.08.18 16:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh CWP-26142-2026 (O&M) ( 2 ) 2. A perusal of the paper book would show that the eviction order against the petitioners was passed on 04.08.1999 and appeal against the same was also dismissed on 16.05.2000 and the said orders have not been challenged. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that he be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh petition after laying down challenge to the said orders as well as other orders which are already under challenge, in accordance with law. 4. In view of the above, present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty aforesaid. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 18.08.2026 Geeta Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No GEETA RANI 2026.08.18 16:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh