IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54079 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-134 Year-2020 Thana- ATHMALGOLA District- Patna ====================================================== 1. Bipin Yadav SON OF LATE RAM LOLINE YADAV R/v - Chanda, p. s. - Athmalgola, District - Patna 2. AZAD YADAV SON OF LATE RAMSWARTH YADAV @ RAM SWARTH SINGH @ KAILLU YADAV R/v - Chanda, p. s. - Athmalgola, District - Patna 3. SALUN YADAV @ SELUN YADAV SON OF LATE RAMSWARTH YADAV @ RAM SWARTH SINGH @ KAILLU YADAV R/v - Chanda, p. s. - Athmalgola, District - Patna 4. RBIN YADAV SON OF BHUNDEV YADAV @ RAMSURTH SINGH @ KAILLU YADAV R/v - Chanda, p. s. - Athmalgola, District - Patna 5. SANJEET YADAV @ BIDHYAK SON OF LATE RAMSWARTH YADAV @ RAM SWARTH SINGH @ KAILLU YADAV R/v - Chanda, p. s. - Athmalgola, District - Patna 6. JAYANTRI KUMAR @ JAYANTRI YADAV SON OF UPENDRA YADAV R/v - Chanda, p. s. - Athmalgola, District - Patna 7. GORELAL YADAV SON OF LATE RAM LOLIN YADAV R/v - Chanda, p. s. - Athmalgola, District - Patna 8. RAKESH KUMAR @ RAKESH YADAV SON OF SHANKAR YADAV R/v - Chanda, p. s. - Athmalgola, District - Patna 9. PANKAJ KUMAR @ PANKAJ YADAV SON OF SHANKAR YADAV R/v - Chanda, p. s. - Athmalgola, District - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Kumari Sujata Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Dilip Kumar No. 1, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 5 05-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 307/379/364 and other allied sections of the IPC. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54079 of 2024(5) dt.05-02-2026 2/2 3. As per FIR, all the FIR named accused persons including these petitioners demanded Rs.50 lacs from the informant on the point of pistol and assaulted him. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that specific overt act of demanding rangdari on the point of pistol is against co-accused Ajeet Yadav and Azad Yadav and no specific overt act has been alleged against these petitioners. Petitioners are co-villagers of informant. 5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail. 6. Considering the facts of the case, prayer for bail of these petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let these petitioners, named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Barh, Patna in Athmalgola Police Station Case No. 134 of 2020, subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Shashi (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T